menu

Evaluation

knowledge

We believe that knowledge is much more powerful when it’s shared. Evidence and evaluation are growing practices, by sharing knowledge we build collective knowledge, create collaboration opportunities and find better ways of preparing rigorous evaluations.

This space is created for sharing evidence and evaluation-related knowledge, evaluation examples and best practices. With a mix of local and international expertise, we see ourselves to be well-positioned to bring local and international evidence and evaluation best practices.

We welcome contributions to the evaluation knowledge hub, if you have evidence and evaluation product, please share with:  mohammad.alatoom@evidenceandevaluation.com.au

Examples of evaluation

Projects conducted

01

Final-Term Evaluation of “Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina” Joint Program.

 

The purpose of the final evaluation was to provide an impartial in-depth review of all aspects of the Joint UN Programme Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina, including its planning, design, implementation, monitoring and reporting. The objective of the evaluation was to review and assess the overall performance of the Programme, its results, inputs activities, partnerships and UN-internal set-up and if and how the delivered outputs contributed to improved local community resilience and more effective prevention, preparedness and response to disasters and to provide forward-looking recommendations to the Government of Switzerland, UN, and Government stakeholders on the sustainability of the Programme results and its scaling up potentials.

The evaluation report is available here.

 

Evaluators: Mohammad Alatoom

Client: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Bosnia and Herzegovina

services
02

Terminal Evaluation of ‘the Climate Aggregation Platform (CAP)’ project

 

The terminal evaluation (TE) assessed the achievement of project results against what was expected to be achieved and drew lessons that can both improve the sustainability of benefits from this project, and aid in the overall enhancement of UNDP programming. The TE report promotes accountability and transparency and assesses the extent of project accomplishments.

The TE provides evidence-based information that is credible, reliable and useful and comply with the UNDP/GEF Evaluation Guidelines. The TE was undertaken in line with UNEG principles concerning independence, credibility, utility, impartiality, transparency, disclosure, ethical, participation, competencies and capacities.

The evaluation report is available here.

 

Evaluator: Mohammad Alatoom

Client: UNDP New York

services
03

Terminal Evaluation of ‘Mainstreaming Conservation of Migratory Soaring Birds into key productive sectors along valley/Red Sea flyway’

 

The Terminal Evaluation (TE) assessed the achievement of project results against what was expected to be achieved and drew lessons that can both improve the sustainability of benefits from this project, and aid in the overall enhancement of UNDP programming. The TE report promotes accountability and transparency and assesses the extent of project accomplishments.

The TE assessed project performance against expectations set out in the project’s Logical Framework/Results Framework and results according to the criteria outlined in the Guidance for Conducting Terminal Evaluations of UNDP-Supported, GEF-Financed Projects.

The TE provides evidence-based information that is credible, reliable and useful and comply with the UNDP/GEF Evaluation Guidelines. The TE was undertaken in line with UNEG principles concerning independence, credibility, utility, impartiality, transparency, disclosure, ethical, participation, competencies and capacities.

The evaluation report is available here.

 

Evaluator: Mohammad Alatoom

Client: UNDP Jordan

services

GET IN TOUCH